Search

Will it be super, a wedge or doughnut?

PUBLISHED: 14:06 02 October 2008 | UPDATED: 11:55 03 July 2010

OFFICIALS from the Boundary Committee have begun sifting through thousands of responses to the proposed overhaul of councils in Norfolk and Suffolk.

The seven-member committee sought the views of residents and interested groups on three options:

A single super-council for Norfolk and Lowestoft.

OFFICIALS from the Boundary Committee have begun sifting through thousands of responses to the proposed overhaul of councils in Norfolk and Suffolk.

The seven-member committee sought the views of residents and interested groups on three options:

A single super-council for Norfolk and Lowestoft.

A “wedge” option of Norwich, Great Yarmouth and Lowestoft, and the rest of Norfolk.

A “doughnut”, comprising greater Norwich surrounded by a rural Norfolk authority.

Officials will examine more than 4,000 replies from Norfolk with a view to making a recommendation to a government minister in December. A final decision is expected in February.

Last Friday saw the official deadline for councils across Norfolk to submit bids for their preferred options.

While the Tory-led borough council ultimately favours the status quo - leaving things as they are - it submitted a bid supporting the wedge option, which is also strongly favoured by Labour.

Meanwhile, a joint sub-mission by five district and borough councils - Broadland, Breckland, North Norfolk, South Norfolk and King's Lynn & West Norfolk - produced a heavyweight prop-osal arguing why the process should be shelved in favour of an enhanced status quo.

Norfolk County Council produced a document supp-orting the super unitary idea.

At a Federation of Small Businesses event at the Cliff Hotel, the debate was domin-ated by unitary proposals, and the prospective Tory parliamentary candidate for Yarmouth, Brandon Lewis, called for the Boundary Committee to stick with the status quo. He said: “As I have said on many occasions, these proposals will not only stick two fingers up to the historic demarcations of our two counties: they are also going to be expensive and will most likely result in a lack of local transparency.

“Labour is trying to preserve its shaky hold on our local councils by messing around with historic and well-proven boundaries; all this at a time when its authority has been eroded across the country. Yarmouth residents deserve better.”

Other News

33 minutes ago

A 20-year-old man has gone missing from the Lowestoft area.

51 minutes ago

A first-year university student who left his father’s BMW suspended in a tree has been disqualified from driving.

Yesterday, 23:30

The fire service drone has been used to help in the search of a missing person near Great Yarmouth.

Yesterday, 19:11

‘It’s just lucky no-one was hurt’ - that is the message after a bus shelter close to a pub in Caister was flattened by a lorry that had been turning around.

Most Read

Wed, 12:29

Police are appealing for help to trace a woman following a theft in Great Yarmouth.

Read more
Tue, 13:10

The man who was killed in a fatal stabbing in Great Yarmouth has been named.

Read more
Norwich Magistrates Court
Thu, 14:16

A young girl left severely disabled after mistakes were made during her birth at a Norfolk hospital will receive an extra £600,000 in damages.

Read more
Wed, 12:20

Residents in Great Yarmouth will be able to enjoy having their favourite fast food orders delivered right to their doorstep thanks to a new delivery service.

Read more
Norwich
Wed, 14:51

Homes are going up on a pub’s garden as it looks for ways to thrive.

Read more

Local Weather

Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 11°C

min temp: 7°C

Show Job Lists

Digital Edition

cover

Enjoy the Great
Yarmouth Mercury

e-edition today

Subscribe

Newsletter Sign Up

Great Yarmouth Mercury weekly newsletter
Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter

Our Privacy Policy