Coastal development bid 'engineered' to avoid affordable homes
- Credit: Google Maps
Planners have refused a bid for nine new homes and say the application appeared "engineered" to avoid affordable housing contributions.
Outline planning was being sought for nine homes in Old Coast Road, Ormesby, once the main route linking Caister to Scratby, California, Hemsby and beyond.
Now stopped up to vehicles, although a walkway remains, the proposed site was on a triangle of land next to Salisbury Cottages, a 19th century terrace of homes.
It proposed a mix of three and four bedroomed detached and semi-detached houses on Grade 1 agricultural land the applicant said had been rented by a farmer but become "unviable."
Refusing the application under delegated powers planners at Great Yarmouth Borough Council said: "It would be difficult to object purely on density grounds except that a figure of nine dwellings appears engineered to avoid affordable housing contributions.
"Because nine dwellings do not trigger affordable housing contributions there is no material public benefit arising from the proposal, other than the delivery of nine larger homes."
The site is also said to be outside village development limits and "remote."
- 1 Renewed bid to bulldoze 'ugly mess' country pub for homes
- 2 'He was a great guest' - Tyson Fury stays at Gorleston hotel
- 3 Everything you need to know ahead of Great Yarmouth Wheels Festival
- 4 How much will Great Yarmouth's new Marina Centre cost?
- 5 Car seen driving on the wrong side of the A47
- 6 Carnival fun finally returns to town after Covid disruption
- 7 What the census tells us about Great Yarmouth
- 8 Thousands flock to village's 'biggest ever' festival
- 9 Hay bale fire leaves holidaymakers stuck on campsite
- 10 Great Yarmouth Row focused in arts documentary
Concerns were also raised over the effect on the rural, coastal landscape and the blurring of boundaries between Ormesby and Caister.
The papers conclude there is "no over-riding reason to give up this land to development."
They add: "The type and mix offer no material planning benefits over and above the delivery of nine homes, where current delivery rates and land allocations elsewhere in the borough are considered to be satisfactory."
They also note the land is Grade 1 farmland that has been cultivated in the recent past.
To view the documents click the link here.