Coastal development bid 'engineered' to avoid affordable homes
- Credit: Google Maps
Planners have refused a bid for nine new homes and say the application appeared "engineered" to avoid affordable housing contributions.
Outline planning was being sought for nine homes in Old Coast Road, Ormesby, once the main route linking Caister to Scratby, California, Hemsby and beyond.
Now stopped up to vehicles, although a walkway remains, the proposed site was on a triangle of land next to Salisbury Cottages, a 19th century terrace of homes.
It proposed a mix of three and four bedroomed detached and semi-detached houses on Grade 1 agricultural land the applicant said had been rented by a farmer but become "unviable."
Refusing the application under delegated powers planners at Great Yarmouth Borough Council said: "It would be difficult to object purely on density grounds except that a figure of nine dwellings appears engineered to avoid affordable housing contributions.
You may also want to watch:
"Because nine dwellings do not trigger affordable housing contributions there is no material public benefit arising from the proposal, other than the delivery of nine larger homes."
The site is also said to be outside village development limits and "remote."
- 1 Teaching couple moving to Wales after decades in Great Yarmouth
- 2 Coronavirus rates where you live in Great Yarmouth borough
- 3 Shoplifters arrested and car seized as police swoop on street
- 4 Motorcyclist, 17, dies after crashing into lamp post
- 5 Hippodrome owners plan to open circus-themed cafe
- 6 £18m price tag for energy hotbed to create 650 jobs
- 7 Police condemn 'blatant' lockdown breaches as 160 fined
- 8 Where are Norfolk and Waveney's Covid vaccination sites?
- 9 Full list: £715,000 to be spent to make 113 Norfolk roads safer
- 10 Parents react to twice weekly Covid tests for school households
Concerns were also raised over the effect on the rural, coastal landscape and the blurring of boundaries between Ormesby and Caister.
The papers conclude there is "no over-riding reason to give up this land to development."
They add: "The type and mix offer no material planning benefits over and above the delivery of nine homes, where current delivery rates and land allocations elsewhere in the borough are considered to be satisfactory."
They also note the land is Grade 1 farmland that has been cultivated in the recent past.
To view the documents click the link here.