Council asked to object to plans to dual A47 over ‘shocking’ emission data
PUBLISHED: 15:42 23 March 2020 | UPDATED: 15:43 23 March 2020
A Norfolk councillor has spoken out against government plans to dual the A47 and highlighted the county’s “shocking” rate of carbon emissions from transport.
Plans for a multi-million pound project to dual a five mile section of road from North Tuddenham to Easton are under consultation by Highways England until April 8.
But a Norwich councillor has called on the council to object to the scheme due to climate change.
At a meeting of Norwich city council on Tuesday, March 17, Green councillor Denise Carlo said: “Last month, an appeal court judgment ruled that a third runway at Heathrow was unlawful because the secretary of state had failed to consider the Paris Agreement on climate change.
“Environmental groups consider that the same argument applies to the government’s road building programme.”
She said a preliminary report on the scheme’s environmental impact referred to a “probable increase in carbon emissions for both construction and operation” and added: “This runs counter to the Paris Agreement and the government’s target of cutting emissions to net zero by 2050.
You may also want to watch:
“Surface transport emissions contribute 23pc of UK emissions, with 2019 statistics showing an increase in traffic emissions.
“Transport’s share of carbon emissions in Norfolk stands at a shocking 38pc. Will the cabinet member ask officers to respond to the consultation stating the city council’s objection to this and other A47 dualling schemes on climate change grounds?”
But Mike Stonard, cabinet member for sustainable growth, said it would be “premature” for the council to object to the “long overdue” A47 improvements.
He said: “The implications of the recent legal judgement about Heathrow are far from certain.
“The need for improvement to the North Tuddenham to Easton section is well-established and something that this council has supported over many years.
“This scheme will reduce congestion, improve road safety and support housing and jobs.”
He added: “I appreciate the importance of trying to reduce transport emissions. However, I am not convinced that objecting to the scheme is appropriate.
“We need to ensure we have an ambitious strategy to minimise the need to travel. This will be best done through the Transport for Norwich Strategy rather than seeking to delay much needed infrastructure investment.”
If you value what this story gives you, please consider supporting the Great Yarmouth Mercury. Click the link in the orange box below for details.