Will it be super, a wedge or doughnut?

OFFICIALS from the Boundary Committee have begun sifting through thousands of responses to the proposed overhaul of councils in Norfolk and Suffolk. The seven-member committee sought the views of residents and interested groups on three options:A single super-council for Norfolk and Lowestoft.

OFFICIALS from the Boundary Committee have begun sifting through thousands of responses to the proposed overhaul of councils in Norfolk and Suffolk.

The seven-member committee sought the views of residents and interested groups on three options:

A single super-council for Norfolk and Lowestoft.

A “wedge” option of Norwich, Great Yarmouth and Lowestoft, and the rest of Norfolk.


You may also want to watch:


A “doughnut”, comprising greater Norwich surrounded by a rural Norfolk authority.

Officials will examine more than 4,000 replies from Norfolk with a view to making a recommendation to a government minister in December. A final decision is expected in February.

Most Read

Last Friday saw the official deadline for councils across Norfolk to submit bids for their preferred options.

While the Tory-led borough council ultimately favours the status quo - leaving things as they are - it submitted a bid supporting the wedge option, which is also strongly favoured by Labour.

Meanwhile, a joint sub-mission by five district and borough councils - Broadland, Breckland, North Norfolk, South Norfolk and King's Lynn & West Norfolk - produced a heavyweight prop-osal arguing why the process should be shelved in favour of an enhanced status quo.

Norfolk County Council produced a document supp-orting the super unitary idea.

At a Federation of Small Businesses event at the Cliff Hotel, the debate was domin-ated by unitary proposals, and the prospective Tory parliamentary candidate for Yarmouth, Brandon Lewis, called for the Boundary Committee to stick with the status quo. He said: “As I have said on many occasions, these proposals will not only stick two fingers up to the historic demarcations of our two counties: they are also going to be expensive and will most likely result in a lack of local transparency.

“Labour is trying to preserve its shaky hold on our local councils by messing around with historic and well-proven boundaries; all this at a time when its authority has been eroded across the country. Yarmouth residents deserve better.”

Become a Supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years. Our industry faces testing times, which is why we're asking for your support. Every contribution will help us continue to produce local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Become a Supporter